1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo No 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo No 1 would be higher. At 2,834 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (294 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1. 1995 Daewoo No 1 has automatic transmission and 2006 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Daewoo No 1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Daewoo No 1 | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Daewoo | Mitsubishi |
Model | No 1 | Colt |
Year Released | 1995 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 2834 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 294 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |