1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo No 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo No 1 would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 229 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Daewoo No 1 | 2009 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | No 1 | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 3726 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 273 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |