1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 2012 Mazda 2
To start off, 2012 Mazda 2 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo No 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo No 1 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 2 (95 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Mazda 2 (205 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 2012 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1. 1995 Daewoo No 1 has automatic transmission and 2012 Mazda 2 has manual transmission. 2012 Mazda 2 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Daewoo No 1 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Daewoo No 1 | 2012 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Daewoo | Mazda |
Model | No 1 | 2 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 1560 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 205 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |