1995 Daewoo No 1 vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo No 1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo No 1 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 308 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Because 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Daewoo No 1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (565 Nm) has 428 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Daewoo No 1. (137 Nm). This means 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Daewoo No 1.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Daewoo No 1 | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
Make | Daewoo | Cadillac |
Model | No 1 | ESCALADE |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1498 cc | 6200 cc |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 397 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 137 Nm | 565 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |