1995 Dodge Avenger vs. 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320
To start off, 1995 Dodge Avenger is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320 would be higher. At 3,208 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320 weights approximately 476 kg more than 1995 Dodge Avenger.
Because 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Dodge Avenger (231 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320. (223 Nm). This means 1995 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Dodge Avenger | 1942 Mercedes-Benz 320 | |
| Make | Dodge | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Avenger | 320 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1942 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3208 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 78 HP |
| Torque | 231 Nm | 223 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 3310 mm |
