1995 Dodge Avenger vs. 1969 Riley 4
To start off, 1995 Dodge Avenger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Riley 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Riley 4 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Dodge Avenger (155 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1969 Riley 4. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Dodge Avenger should accelerate faster than 1969 Riley 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Dodge Avenger weights approximately 222 kg more than 1969 Riley 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Riley 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Riley 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Dodge Avenger (218 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Riley 4. (121 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1995 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Riley 4.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Dodge Avenger | 1969 Riley 4 | |
Make | Dodge | Riley |
Model | Avenger | 4 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1969 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 218 Nm | 121 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.5 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1370 kg | 1148 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |