1995 Dodge Avenger vs. 1969 Triumph 1300
To start off, 1995 Dodge Avenger is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Triumph 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Triumph 1300 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Dodge Avenger weights approximately 459 kg more than 1969 Triumph 1300.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Dodge Avenger (231 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Triumph 1300. (99 Nm). This means 1995 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Triumph 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Dodge Avenger | 1969 Triumph 1300 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Avenger | 1300 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1969 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 61 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 99 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2460 mm |