1995 Dodge Avenger vs. 2003 MG ZR
To start off, 2003 MG ZR is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Dodge Avenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Dodge Avenger would be higher. At 2,501 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Dodge Avenger weights approximately 254 kg more than 2003 MG ZR.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Dodge Avenger (231 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MG ZR. (174 Nm). This means 1995 Dodge Avenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MG ZR. 1995 Dodge Avenger has automatic transmission and 2003 MG ZR has manual transmission. 2003 MG ZR will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Dodge Avenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Dodge Avenger | 2003 MG ZR | |
Make | Dodge | MG |
Model | Avenger | ZR |
Year Released | 1995 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 174 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 1120 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2510 mm |