1995 Dodge Avenger vs. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Dodge Avenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Dodge Avenger would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1068 kg more than 1995 Dodge Avenger.
Because 2004 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Dodge Avenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Dodge Avenger. (231 Nm). This means 2004 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Dodge Avenger.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Dodge Avenger | 2004 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Dodge | Land Rover |
Model | Avenger | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 282 HP |
Torque | 231 Nm | 441 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1374 kg | 2442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2890 mm |