1995 Dodge Avenger vs. 2012 Peugeot 4007
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 4007 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Dodge Avenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Dodge Avenger would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 4007 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1995 Dodge Avenger. (155 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 4007 should accelerate faster than 1995 Dodge Avenger.
Because 2012 Peugeot 4007 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Dodge Avenger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 4007 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Peugeot 4007 (232 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Dodge Avenger. (218 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2012 Peugeot 4007 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Dodge Avenger. 1995 Dodge Avenger has automatic transmission and 2012 Peugeot 4007 has manual transmission. 2012 Peugeot 4007 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Dodge Avenger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Dodge Avenger | 2012 Peugeot 4007 | |
Make | Dodge | Peugeot |
Model | Avenger | 4007 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 155 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 232 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.5 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |