1995 Dodge Avenger vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Dodge Avenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Dodge Avenger would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Dodge Avenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1995 Dodge Avenger. (155 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1995 Dodge Avenger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 160 kg more than 1995 Dodge Avenger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Dodge Avenger, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (353 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Dodge Avenger. (218 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Dodge Avenger.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Dodge Avenger 2013 Cadillac ATS
Make Dodge Cadillac
Model Avenger ATS
Year Released 1995 2013
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2497 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 155 HP 268 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 218 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 5500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 83.5 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.4:1 9.5
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1370 kg 1530 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4643 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 1806 mm
Vehicle Height 1350 mm 1417 mm
Wheelbase Size 2640 mm 2776 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 61 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]