1995 Dodge Caravan vs. 1963 Mini MK I
To start off, 1995 Dodge Caravan is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Dodge Caravan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Dodge Caravan (100 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1963 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Dodge Caravan should accelerate faster than 1963 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Dodge Caravan weights approximately 790 kg more than 1963 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Dodge Caravan (183 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1995 Dodge Caravan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Dodge Caravan | 1963 Mini MK I | |
Make | Dodge | Mini |
Model | Caravan | MK I |
Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1405 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1650 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2040 mm |