1995 Dodge Dakota vs. 1965 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Dodge Dakota is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Dodge Dakota (247 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 450 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Dodge Dakota (467 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Dodge Dakota | 1965 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Dakota | 2000 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5899 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 247 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 467 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4980 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |