1995 Dodge Dakota vs. 2009 Jeep Commander

To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Dodge Dakota. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Dodge Dakota would be higher. At 5,899 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Dodge Dakota (247 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Commander. (210 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Commander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 423 kg more than 1995 Dodge Dakota.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Dodge Dakota (467 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Commander. (319 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Commander.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Dodge Dakota 2009 Jeep Commander
Make Dodge Jeep
Model Dakota Commander
Year Released 1995 2009
Body Type Pickup SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5899 cc 3701 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 247 HP 210 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 467 Nm 319 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1620 kg 2043 kg
Vehicle Length 4980 mm 4790 mm
Vehicle Width 1820 mm 1910 mm
Vehicle Height 1670 mm 1840 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2790 mm