1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1942 Volvo PV 801-10
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 (85 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (75 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1942 Volvo PV 801-10. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Fiat Bravo | 1942 Volvo PV 801-10 | |
| Make | Fiat | Volvo |
| Model | Bravo | PV 801-10 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1942 |
| Engine Size | 1895 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3260 mm |
