1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1949 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (80 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1949 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 100 kg more than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1949 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Fiat Bravo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1949 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1949 Jeep CJ2A (145 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (111 Nm). This means 1949 Jeep CJ2A will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Fiat Bravo | 1949 Jeep CJ2A | |
| Make | Fiat | Jeep |
| Model | Bravo | CJ2A |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1949 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1372 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 80 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 111 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2040 mm |
