1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1950 Saab 92
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,893 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 1950 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1950 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 365 kg more than 1950 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 1950 Saab 92 | |
Make | Fiat | Saab |
Model | Bravo | 92 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1950 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1893 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2480 mm |