1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1953 Ford Crestline
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 3,929 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Ford Crestline (108 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (103 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Ford Crestline should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Ford Crestline weights approximately 430 kg more than 1995 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 1953 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Bravo | Crestline |
Year Released | 1995 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 3929 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2940 mm |