1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1953 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,895 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (75 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 1953 Isuzu Minx. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1953 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 185 kg more than 1953 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Fiat Bravo | 1953 Isuzu Minx | |
| Make | Fiat | Isuzu |
| Model | Bravo | Minx |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1895 cc | 1265 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2370 mm |
