1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1955 Ford Crestline
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford Crestline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford Crestline would be higher. At 4,453 cc (8 cylinders), 1955 Ford Crestline is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Ford Crestline weights approximately 500 kg more than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1955 Ford Crestline is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford Crestline. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 1955 Ford Crestline | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Bravo | Crestline |
Year Released | 1995 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 4453 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2940 mm |