1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1957 Seat 600
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Seat 600 would be higher. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1957 Seat 600. (19 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1957 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 435 kg more than 1957 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1957 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1957 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Fiat Bravo (111 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 Seat 600. (40 Nm). This means 1995 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 1957 Seat 600 | |
Make | Fiat | Seat |
Model | Bravo | 600 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 19 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 40 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2010 mm |