1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1958 Nissan 211
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Nissan 211. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Nissan 211 would be higher. At 1,893 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1958 Nissan 211. (34 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1958 Nissan 211. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 245 kg more than 1958 Nissan 211. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Fiat Bravo (200 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1958 Nissan 211. (67 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1995 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1958 Nissan 211.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Fiat Bravo | 1958 Nissan 211 | |
| Make | Fiat | Nissan |
| Model | Bravo | 211 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1958 |
| Engine Size | 1893 cc | 988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 200 Nm | 67 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 925 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1470 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2230 mm |
