1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1963 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,746 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (113 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 570 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Elan is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Elan. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Fiat Bravo (155 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1995 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 1963 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Fiat | Lotus |
Model | Bravo | Elan |
Year Released | 1995 | 1963 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1746 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 72.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Top Speed | 183 km/hour | 185 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1164 kg | 594 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |