1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1967 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Nissan Cedric (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (75 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 145 kg more than 1995 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Nissan Cedric (166 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (147 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1967 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Bravo | Cedric |
Year Released | 1995 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1895 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |