1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1968 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 160 kg more than 1995 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (111 Nm). This means 1968 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 1968 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Fiat | Triumph |
Model | Bravo | 2000 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 158 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 64 L |