1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1976 TVR 3000
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,994 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 TVR 3000 weights approximately 10 kg more than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1976 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 1976 TVR 3000 | |
Make | Fiat | TVR |
Model | Bravo | 3000 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 2994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 58 L |