1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1982 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Seat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Seat Ritmo would be higher. At 1,372 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (63 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1982 Seat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 130 kg more than 1982 Seat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Fiat Bravo (111 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Seat Ritmo. (92 Nm). This means 1995 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Seat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 1982 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Fiat | Seat |
Model | Bravo | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1995 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 111 Nm | 92 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2460 mm |