1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1985 Mercury Lynx
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Mercury Lynx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Mercury Lynx would be higher. At 1,859 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (113 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1985 Mercury Lynx. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1985 Mercury Lynx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 139 kg more than 1985 Mercury Lynx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Fiat Bravo (155 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Mercury Lynx. (144 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1995 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Mercury Lynx.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 1985 Mercury Lynx | |
Make | Fiat | Mercury |
Model | Bravo | Lynx |
Year Released | 1995 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1746 cc | 1859 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1164 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2400 mm |