1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1991 Volvo 960
To start off, 1995 Fiat Bravo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Volvo 960. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Volvo 960 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1991 Volvo 960 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1991 Volvo 960 (187 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (103 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1991 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Volvo 960 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1995 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1991 Volvo 960 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1991 Volvo 960. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 1991 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Bravo | 960 |
Year Released | 1995 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2780 mm |