1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 1997 Mini MK VII
To start off, 1997 Mini MK VII is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 1,746 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (113 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1997 Mini MK VII. (96 HP @ 6130 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1997 Mini MK VII. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 429 kg more than 1997 Mini MK VII. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Fiat Bravo (155 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mini MK VII. (115 Nm @ 2650 RPM). This means 1995 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mini MK VII.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Fiat Bravo | 1997 Mini MK VII | |
| Make | Fiat | Mini |
| Model | Bravo | MK VII |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1746 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 96 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6130 RPM |
| Torque | 155 Nm | 115 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 2650 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1164 kg | 735 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 3060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2040 mm |
