1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 357 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (103 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (144 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Bravo | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2580 mm |