1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 2001 Proton 400
To start off, 2001 Proton 400 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 1,746 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (113 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 2001 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 2001 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 174 kg more than 2001 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Fiat Bravo (155 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 2001 Proton 400 | |
Make | Fiat | Proton |
Model | Bravo | 400 |
Year Released | 1995 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1746 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1164 kg | 990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2510 mm |