1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 2003 MCC Smart

To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 1,893 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Fiat Bravo (104 HP) has 31 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (73 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 205 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Fiat Bravo (200 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (100 Nm). This means 1995 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Fiat Bravo 2003 MCC Smart
Make Fiat MCC
Model Bravo Smart
Year Released 1995 2003
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1893 cc 1124 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 3 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 104 HP 73 HP
Torque 200 Nm 100 Nm
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 75.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90.4 mm 84.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.5:1 10.5:1
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1170 kg 965 kg
Vehicle Length 4030 mm 3760 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 47 L