1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 2006 Renault Clio

To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 1,390 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Clio weights approximately 20 kg more than 1995 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Renault Clio (127 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (111 Nm). This means 2006 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Fiat Bravo.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Fiat Bravo 2006 Renault Clio
Make Fiat Renault
Model Bravo Clio
Year Released 1995 2006
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1372 cc 1390 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 80 HP 97 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 111 Nm 127 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1010 kg 1030 kg
Vehicle Length 4030 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2670 mm 2690 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 50 L