1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Volkswagen Polo (114 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Bravo.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Fiat Bravo (200 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. (170 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1995 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Polo.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Fiat Bravo 2006 Volkswagen Polo
Make Fiat Volkswagen
Model Bravo Polo
Year Released 1995 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1893 cc 1984 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 104 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 200 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 1500 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 82.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90.4 mm 92.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.5:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Top Speed 187 km/hour 193 km/hour
Acceleration 0-100mph 10.4 seconds 10.1 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4030 mm 4200 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1430 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 45 L