1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 2007 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2007 Nissan Armada is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 5,552 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Nissan Armada (318 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Nissan Armada should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Nissan Armada (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 322 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (200 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2007 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Fiat Bravo. 2007 Nissan Armada has automatic transmission and 1995 Fiat Bravo has manual transmission. 1995 Fiat Bravo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2007 Nissan Armada will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 2007 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Bravo | Armada |
Year Released | 1995 | 2007 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1893 cc | 5552 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 106 L |