1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (103 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (144 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Bravo | Megane |
Year Released | 1995 | 2010 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1580 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 144 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.4 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.5 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 184 km/hour | 236 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 60 L |