1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Bravo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1376 kg more than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Bravo | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
Make | Fiat | Fisker |
Model | Bravo | Karma |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Single Speed |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1164 kg | 2540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4996 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1331 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 3160 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 36 L |