1995 Fiat Bravo vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Bravo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Bravo would be higher. At 2,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 165 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (75 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Commodore (240 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Fiat Bravo. (147 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Fiat Bravo | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Fiat | Holden |
| Model | Bravo | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1895 cc | 2564 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 240 HP |
| Torque | 147 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
