1995 Fiat Panda vs. 1951 Humber Pullman
To start off, 1995 Fiat Panda is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Humber Pullman. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Humber Pullman would be higher. At 4,085 cc (6 cylinders), 1951 Humber Pullman is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Humber Pullman (100 HP) has 66 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Panda. (34 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Humber Pullman should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Humber Pullman weights approximately 1352 kg more than 1995 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Humber Pullman is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Humber Pullman. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Fiat Panda | 1951 Humber Pullman | |
| Make | Fiat | Humber |
| Model | Panda | Pullman |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 769 cc | 4085 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 6.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 2032 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3420 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2170 mm | 3330 mm |
