1995 Fiat Tempra vs. 2012 Koenigsegg Agera
To start off, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Tempra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Tempra would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera (1,100 HP) has 1025 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Tempra. (75 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Koenigsegg Agera should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Tempra.
Because 2012 Koenigsegg Agera is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Koenigsegg Agera. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Fiat Tempra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Tempra | 2012 Koenigsegg Agera | |
Make | Fiat | Koenigsegg |
Model | Tempra | Agera |
Year Released | 1995 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 1100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Biofuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4293 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1996 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2660 mm |