1995 Fiat Tempra vs. 2013 Kia Optima
To start off, 2013 Kia Optima is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Tempra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Tempra would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia Optima (197 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Tempra. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Tempra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Kia Optima (252 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Fiat Tempra. (110 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2013 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Fiat Tempra.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Tempra | 2013 Kia Optima | |
Make | Fiat | Kia |
Model | Tempra | Optima |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1372 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 252 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80.6 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 67.4 mm | 97 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4845 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2795 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 70 L |