1995 Fiat Tempra vs. 2013 Mini Countryman
To start off, 2013 Mini Countryman is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Tempra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Tempra would be higher.
Because 2013 Mini Countryman is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Fiat Tempra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mini Countryman will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mini Countryman (281 Nm @ 5600 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Fiat Tempra. (110 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2013 Mini Countryman will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Fiat Tempra.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Fiat Tempra | 2013 Mini Countryman | |
| Make | Fiat | Mini |
| Model | Tempra | Countryman |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 75 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 80.6 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 67.4 mm | 85 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4133 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2595 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 47 L |
