1995 Fiat Tempra vs. 2013 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2013 Toyota Matrix is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Fiat Tempra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Fiat Tempra would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Matrix (130 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1995 Fiat Tempra. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1995 Fiat Tempra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 35 kg more than 1995 Fiat Tempra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Fiat Tempra | 2013 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Fiat | Toyota |
Model | Tempra | Matrix |
Year Released | 1995 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1755 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1250 kg | 1285 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4365 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1550 mm |