1995 Ford Aerostar vs. 1954 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1995 Ford Aerostar is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1954 Jeep CJ (136 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1995 Ford Aerostar. (134 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 335 kg more than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Ford Aerostar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (325 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Aerostar | 1954 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Aerostar | CJ |
Year Released | 1995 | 1954 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2060 mm |