1995 Ford Aerostar vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1995 Ford Aerostar is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Aerostar (134 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 345 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Aerostar | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Ford | Triumph |
| Model | Aerostar | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1995 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 91 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2700 mm |
