1995 Ford Aerostar vs. 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT
To start off, 1995 Ford Aerostar is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT would be higher. At 3,001 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1995 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT (427 Nm) has 210 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm). This means 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
1995 Ford Aerostar | 1991 Mitsubishi 3000GT | |
Make | Ford | Mitsubishi |
Model | Aerostar | 3000GT |
Year Released | 1995 | 1991 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2979 cc | 3001 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 134 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 427 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |