1995 Ford Aerostar vs. 2001 Mazda 6

To start off, 2001 Mazda 6 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mazda 6 (139 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1995 Ford Aerostar. (134 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6 should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 140 kg more than 2001 Mazda 6.

Because 1995 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda 6. (181 Nm @ 4100 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications:

1995 Ford Aerostar 2001 Mazda 6
Make Ford Mazda
Model Aerostar 6
Year Released 1995 2001
Body Type Minivan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2979 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 134 HP 139 HP
Engine RPM 4600 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 217 Nm 181 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4100 RPM
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 1515 kg 1375 kg
Vehicle Length 4450 mm 4690 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1860 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 3030 mm 2680 mm