1995 Ford Aerostar vs. 2003 MCC Smart

To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Aerostar (134 HP) has 28 more horse power than 2003 MCC Smart. (106 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 2003 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 540 kg more than 2003 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1995 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart.

Compare all specifications: