1995 Ford Aerostar vs. 2004 Dodge Neon
To start off, 2004 Dodge Neon is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 2,979 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Ford Aerostar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Ford Aerostar (134 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2004 Dodge Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1995 Ford Aerostar should accelerate faster than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Because 1995 Ford Aerostar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Aerostar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Aerostar (217 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Dodge Neon. (152 Nm @ 4900 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Aerostar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Dodge Neon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1995 Ford Aerostar | 2004 Dodge Neon | |
| Make | Ford | Dodge |
| Model | Aerostar | Neon |
| Year Released | 1995 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2979 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 134 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 152 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1860 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2650 mm |
